<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review: 28 Weeks Later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-25227</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/#comment-25227</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re kidding.  Easily the best horror movie of the year thus far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re kidding.  Easily the best horror movie of the year thus far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-25048</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/#comment-25048</guid>
		<description>&#039;john&#039; is completly right...and you are completly wrong. You acctually never said anything about the movie apart from &#039;&#039;I found it boring and pointless&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;I was ripped off.&#039;&#039; Why the hell would anyone care about you not likeing the movie unless you say exactly what you didnt like about it.

 Also, you said &#039;&#039;If you want to criticize a review, you need to be able to give specific examples of what it did wrong...&#039;&#039; HE DID! Why dont YOU &#039;&#039;actually read what is said in its entirety?&#039;&#039; I think your review was shallow and off the point (rambiling on about how you like nacho&#039;s and space invaders)

On a side note: Iv seen this movie and I think its great. It has a griity feeling like a documentary about it and the &#039;&#039;28...later&#039;&#039; universe is unique and compeling (aside from being very scary),a work of art. I could go on but I am not the one supposed to be writting a review here. All i can say is that &#039;nick&#039; is not even worth your time and the fact that people have taken their own time to go on here and write complaints about this review that goes against every other review iv read about this great movie, speaks for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;john&#8217; is completly right&#8230;and you are completly wrong. You acctually never said anything about the movie apart from &#8221;I found it boring and pointless&#8221; and &#8221;I was ripped off.&#8221; Why the hell would anyone care about you not likeing the movie unless you say exactly what you didnt like about it.</p>
<p> Also, you said &#8221;If you want to criticize a review, you need to be able to give specific examples of what it did wrong&#8230;&#8221; HE DID! Why dont YOU &#8221;actually read what is said in its entirety?&#8221; I think your review was shallow and off the point (rambiling on about how you like nacho&#8217;s and space invaders)</p>
<p>On a side note: Iv seen this movie and I think its great. It has a griity feeling like a documentary about it and the &#8221;28&#8230;later&#8221; universe is unique and compeling (aside from being very scary),a work of art. I could go on but I am not the one supposed to be writting a review here. All i can say is that &#8216;nick&#8217; is not even worth your time and the fact that people have taken their own time to go on here and write complaints about this review that goes against every other review iv read about this great movie, speaks for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1-900-HEY-NICK</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-24288</link>
		<dc:creator>1-900-HEY-NICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 11:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/#comment-24288</guid>
		<description>Are you people even reading this, or just getting to the point where I say I don&#039;t like it, at which point you start making shit up? I&#039;m not going spend time pulling quotes out of what I already wrote. My rebuttal is to ask that you actually read the review in its entirety, which I don&#039;t think you&#039;ve done.

If you want to criticize a review, you need to be able to give specific examples of what it did wrong, &lt;em&gt;that are true and actually related to the review at hand&lt;/em&gt;, or your criticism&#039;s aren&#039;t worth much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you people even reading this, or just getting to the point where I say I don&#8217;t like it, at which point you start making shit up? I&#8217;m not going spend time pulling quotes out of what I already wrote. My rebuttal is to ask that you actually read the review in its entirety, which I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ve done.</p>
<p>If you want to criticize a review, you need to be able to give specific examples of what it did wrong, <em>that are true and actually related to the review at hand</em>, or your criticism&#8217;s aren&#8217;t worth much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-24013</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 01:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/#comment-24013</guid>
		<description>You seem to have many criticisms for 28 weeks later without actually pinpointing any of them besides saying that the opening scene was like playing with a new toy.  You don&#039;t even mention how it was like playing with a new toy.  You seem to have a lot to say but so far have said nothing other than &quot;I didn&#039;t like this movie&quot; over and over and over again.  If you want to criticize a film you need to be able to give specific examples on what it did wrong otherwise your criticisms aren&#039;t worth much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to have many criticisms for 28 weeks later without actually pinpointing any of them besides saying that the opening scene was like playing with a new toy.  You don&#8217;t even mention how it was like playing with a new toy.  You seem to have a lot to say but so far have said nothing other than &#8220;I didn&#8217;t like this movie&#8221; over and over and over again.  If you want to criticize a film you need to be able to give specific examples on what it did wrong otherwise your criticisms aren&#8217;t worth much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obvious Zombie</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-23817</link>
		<dc:creator>Obvious Zombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 10:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/#comment-23817</guid>
		<description>Have you no imagination, Reverend? 

I always thought that as a prequel they could do a &lt;i&gt;28 Hours Later...&lt;/i&gt;, basically detailing that second day of events which culminate in the rise of the zombie virus vs. the whole of Britain and her army. Going over the events of how the isle came to be the desolate wasteland it is at the beginning of &lt;i&gt;28 Days...&lt;/i&gt;. This one would have the potential to be a quite horrifically bloody, apocalyptic Zombie war flick. 

See, that wasn&#039;t so hard to imagine, right? (Now if they wind up making this, I want cash)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you no imagination, Reverend? </p>
<p>I always thought that as a prequel they could do a <i>28 Hours Later&#8230;</i>, basically detailing that second day of events which culminate in the rise of the zombie virus vs. the whole of Britain and her army. Going over the events of how the isle came to be the desolate wasteland it is at the beginning of <i>28 Days&#8230;</i>. This one would have the potential to be a quite horrifically bloody, apocalyptic Zombie war flick. </p>
<p>See, that wasn&#8217;t so hard to imagine, right? (Now if they wind up making this, I want cash)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1-900-HEY-NICK</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-23807</link>
		<dc:creator>1-900-HEY-NICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 07:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/#comment-23807</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Maybe you should stick to writing reviews solely on what you like&lt;/em&gt;

That&#039;s half of what a review is. The other is whether it was any good. Liking something and recognizing that it&#039;s good are different things. I neither liked it nor though it was good, and I made my case for it.

&lt;em&gt;seeing how the review you just posted is horribly contrived &amp; ill informed&lt;/em&gt;

Care to back that up by telling me exactly what about it is contrived and ill-informed? May then I can actually address your concerns.

&lt;em&gt;it seems like you reviewed 28 weeks later halfway through watching Firehouse Dog.&lt;/em&gt;

Incorrect.

&lt;em&gt;have you even scene 28 days later…&lt;/em&gt;

Yes.

&lt;em&gt;the prequel would be what? Pissed off monkey in a cage for an hour &amp; the exploits of eviro-bandits.&lt;/em&gt;

No, that&#039;s the start of &lt;em&gt;28 Days Later&lt;/em&gt;. A prequel, by definition, means what happened before that. Like, I dunno, how the monkeys got into the cage to begin with? How the virus they were infected with came to be?

&lt;em&gt;the drivel I was just subjected to.&lt;/em&gt;

Subjected? Take some responsibility for your actions. Nobody forced you to read it. If you&#039;re the sort of person who can&#039;t tolerate opinions that differ from yours, perhaps you should have stopped. Indeed, perhaps you should stay off the Internet altogether.

See, this is what I love about the Internet: anybody can say anything they want. And this is what I hate about the Internet: anybody can say anything they want. If you diagree with me, that&#039;s great! If you&#039;d actually said &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt; you disagree rather than pretending that you&#039;re right and I&#039;m wrong in absolute terms, you&#039;d have left room for the possibility of actually exchanging of ideas. Instead, you chose to  waste both of our time. This is not a rhetorical question: why did you bother?

If you want to have an actual conversation about why you think I&#039;m wrong, I&#039;m up for it. I&#039;m open to having my mind changed. But you don&#039;t accomplish that like this. 

Please try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Maybe you should stick to writing reviews solely on what you like</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s half of what a review is. The other is whether it was any good. Liking something and recognizing that it&#8217;s good are different things. I neither liked it nor though it was good, and I made my case for it.</p>
<p><em>seeing how the review you just posted is horribly contrived &#038; ill informed</em></p>
<p>Care to back that up by telling me exactly what about it is contrived and ill-informed? May then I can actually address your concerns.</p>
<p><em>it seems like you reviewed 28 weeks later halfway through watching Firehouse Dog.</em></p>
<p>Incorrect.</p>
<p><em>have you even scene 28 days later…</em></p>
<p>Yes.</p>
<p><em>the prequel would be what? Pissed off monkey in a cage for an hour &#038; the exploits of eviro-bandits.</em></p>
<p>No, that&#8217;s the start of <em>28 Days Later</em>. A prequel, by definition, means what happened before that. Like, I dunno, how the monkeys got into the cage to begin with? How the virus they were infected with came to be?</p>
<p><em>the drivel I was just subjected to.</em></p>
<p>Subjected? Take some responsibility for your actions. Nobody forced you to read it. If you&#8217;re the sort of person who can&#8217;t tolerate opinions that differ from yours, perhaps you should have stopped. Indeed, perhaps you should stay off the Internet altogether.</p>
<p>See, this is what I love about the Internet: anybody can say anything they want. And this is what I hate about the Internet: anybody can say anything they want. If you diagree with me, that&#8217;s great! If you&#8217;d actually said <em>why</em> you disagree rather than pretending that you&#8217;re right and I&#8217;m wrong in absolute terms, you&#8217;d have left room for the possibility of actually exchanging of ideas. Instead, you chose to  waste both of our time. This is not a rhetorical question: why did you bother?</p>
<p>If you want to have an actual conversation about why you think I&#8217;m wrong, I&#8217;m up for it. I&#8217;m open to having my mind changed. But you don&#8217;t accomplish that like this. </p>
<p>Please try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reverend Whack</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-23790</link>
		<dc:creator>Reverend Whack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 20:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/#comment-23790</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should stick to writing reviews solely on what you like, seeing how the review you just posted is horribly contrived &amp; ill informed, it seems like you reviewed 28 weeks later halfway through watching Firehouse Dog. 
As for the mention of the prequel to 28days later... have you even scene 28 days later... the prequel would be what? Pissed off monkey in a cage for an hour &amp; the exploits of eviro-bandits.
If the likes of TerrorVision, Ghostbusters, My Cousin Vinnie, Gotcha!, La Bamba, and yes, The Dirtbike Kid are your cup of Tea I will offer my services to this website free of charge.
My resume is rather impressive &amp; my range awe inspiring compared to the drivel I was just subjected to.
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should stick to writing reviews solely on what you like, seeing how the review you just posted is horribly contrived &amp; ill informed, it seems like you reviewed 28 weeks later halfway through watching Firehouse Dog.<br />
As for the mention of the prequel to 28days later&#8230; have you even scene 28 days later&#8230; the prequel would be what? Pissed off monkey in a cage for an hour &amp; the exploits of eviro-bandits.<br />
If the likes of TerrorVision, Ghostbusters, My Cousin Vinnie, Gotcha!, La Bamba, and yes, The Dirtbike Kid are your cup of Tea I will offer my services to this website free of charge.<br />
My resume is rather impressive &amp; my range awe inspiring compared to the drivel I was just subjected to.<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mans Maxx</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/comment-page-1/#comment-23700</link>
		<dc:creator>Mans Maxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 22:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2007/05/18/movie-review-28-weeks-later/#comment-23700</guid>
		<description>[...] 28 Weeks Later reviewed @ Geeks of Doom [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 28 Weeks Later reviewed @ Geeks of Doom [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

