<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Bond 22’ Gets a Title!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/24/bond-22-gets-a-title/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/24/bond-22-gets-a-title/</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeverWanderer</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/24/bond-22-gets-a-title/comment-page-1/#comment-134974</link>
		<dc:creator>NeverWanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/24/bond-22-gets-a-title/#comment-134974</guid>
		<description>I like any title that has more than a little thought put into it, so as awkward as it may stumble off the tongue, I&#039;m diggin&#039; it!

It&#039;s strange... I never used to get excited about Bond films. It was always, &quot;Oop! Another Bond. Must be that time of year again.&quot;  But I&#039;m am REALLY stoked about seeing this one.

I just hope it lives up to the standards Casino Royale set. A different director can change a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like any title that has more than a little thought put into it, so as awkward as it may stumble off the tongue, I&#8217;m diggin&#8217; it!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s strange&#8230; I never used to get excited about Bond films. It was always, &#8220;Oop! Another Bond. Must be that time of year again.&#8221;  But I&#8217;m am REALLY stoked about seeing this one.</p>
<p>I just hope it lives up to the standards Casino Royale set. A different director can change a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/24/bond-22-gets-a-title/comment-page-1/#comment-134629</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/24/bond-22-gets-a-title/#comment-134629</guid>
		<description>While it&#039;s an odd title, bring it on!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s an odd title, bring it on!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sir jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/24/bond-22-gets-a-title/comment-page-1/#comment-134535</link>
		<dc:creator>sir jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/2008/01/24/bond-22-gets-a-title/#comment-134535</guid>
		<description>too weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

