<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Ninja Scroll&#8217; Movie On The Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2008/10/28/ninja-scroll-movie-on-the-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2008/10/28/ninja-scroll-movie-on-the-way/</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2008/10/28/ninja-scroll-movie-on-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-457633</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=6689#comment-457633</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll be missing the best parts, so it&#039;ll suck.

Unless they want an X rating.

It&#039;ll be like watching the theatrical version of Eyes Wide Shut, where mysterious black CGI figures obscured almost the entire screen (during *that* scene) so that we could see maybe a flailing ankle or bit of tossed hair.  

Best thing they could do is what they did for Caligula -- get a production company that could manifest what it&#039;s really all about.  Then they could tastefully edit out the naughty bits for the theatrical version (they&#039;ll do that anyway), and reinstate them for the DVD.  Instead, what they&#039;ll do is write and direct it from the ground up based on only what will squeeze by the MPAA ratings.  Sigh.

*SPOILER*



How the hell will they manage to pull of an &quot;acceptable&quot; rating if one of the main characters (hell, the damsel in distress) kills people by screwing them!?!?!?  I bet they change it to something significantly less fun.  Like kissing.  Or winking.  Or perhaps her tears will kill someone, and she has to get all emotional.  Bleh.

I still look forward to it.  It&#039;s one of the first anime movies I&#039;ve owned, and despite the criticism of the movie, it&#039;s one of my faves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be missing the best parts, so it&#8217;ll suck.</p>
<p>Unless they want an X rating.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be like watching the theatrical version of Eyes Wide Shut, where mysterious black CGI figures obscured almost the entire screen (during *that* scene) so that we could see maybe a flailing ankle or bit of tossed hair.  </p>
<p>Best thing they could do is what they did for Caligula &#8212; get a production company that could manifest what it&#8217;s really all about.  Then they could tastefully edit out the naughty bits for the theatrical version (they&#8217;ll do that anyway), and reinstate them for the DVD.  Instead, what they&#8217;ll do is write and direct it from the ground up based on only what will squeeze by the MPAA ratings.  Sigh.</p>
<p>*SPOILER*</p>
<p>How the hell will they manage to pull of an &#8220;acceptable&#8221; rating if one of the main characters (hell, the damsel in distress) kills people by screwing them!?!?!?  I bet they change it to something significantly less fun.  Like kissing.  Or winking.  Or perhaps her tears will kill someone, and she has to get all emotional.  Bleh.</p>
<p>I still look forward to it.  It&#8217;s one of the first anime movies I&#8217;ve owned, and despite the criticism of the movie, it&#8217;s one of my faves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

