<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Choices Or Bad Choices: &#8216;Fable 3&#8242; To Use Project Natal, Charge For Items?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2009/10/23/good-choices-or-bad-choices-fable-3-to-use-project-natal-charge-for-items/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2009/10/23/good-choices-or-bad-choices-fable-3-to-use-project-natal-charge-for-items/</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizo</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2009/10/23/good-choices-or-bad-choices-fable-3-to-use-project-natal-charge-for-items/comment-page-1/#comment-970419</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=31611#comment-970419</guid>
		<description>lots of typos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lots of typos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizo</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2009/10/23/good-choices-or-bad-choices-fable-3-to-use-project-natal-charge-for-items/comment-page-1/#comment-970418</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=31611#comment-970418</guid>
		<description>well they said that you wont have to stand infront of the tv holding a pretend gun or something they clearly said that they will allow you to intereact like have sex ~moving~ with a person with your body LOL fun fun fun... and you can touch the persons hand and squeeze there hand and hug them and kiss them and anything but the fightting gameplay will mostlikely be normal with a remote the ~touch~ feature will only be for like ruler stuff,,,,, so its gonna be fun and you still can use your remote and done be an idiot and throw your remote aacross the room so u can touch someones hand in the game</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well they said that you wont have to stand infront of the tv holding a pretend gun or something they clearly said that they will allow you to intereact like have sex ~moving~ with a person with your body LOL fun fun fun&#8230; and you can touch the persons hand and squeeze there hand and hug them and kiss them and anything but the fightting gameplay will mostlikely be normal with a remote the ~touch~ feature will only be for like ruler stuff,,,,, so its gonna be fun and you still can use your remote and done be an idiot and throw your remote aacross the room so u can touch someones hand in the game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Movie God</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2009/10/23/good-choices-or-bad-choices-fable-3-to-use-project-natal-charge-for-items/comment-page-1/#comment-970283</link>
		<dc:creator>The Movie God</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=31611#comment-970283</guid>
		<description>@Matt

I&#039;m not saying joysticks are superior and I know that this is the future in some fashion, but what I&#039;m saying is that I don&#039;t want to stand there making a gun out of my fingers like in Futurama. I don&#039;t see how anyone could have fun just standing there, even if you go back to the &#039;80s and pretend with a bat.

I think they need to evolve the joystick so that you can play these motion sensor games and become immersed in a 3-D, maybe 4-D world, but still have something in your hands that allows you to feel like you&#039;re in control of your actions and the story.

With nothing, you&#039;ll feel empty as a gamer, and it will be like that old game show Nick Arcade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying joysticks are superior and I know that this is the future in some fashion, but what I&#8217;m saying is that I don&#8217;t want to stand there making a gun out of my fingers like in Futurama. I don&#8217;t see how anyone could have fun just standing there, even if you go back to the &#8217;80s and pretend with a bat.</p>
<p>I think they need to evolve the joystick so that you can play these motion sensor games and become immersed in a 3-D, maybe 4-D world, but still have something in your hands that allows you to feel like you&#8217;re in control of your actions and the story.</p>
<p>With nothing, you&#8217;ll feel empty as a gamer, and it will be like that old game show Nick Arcade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2009/10/23/good-choices-or-bad-choices-fable-3-to-use-project-natal-charge-for-items/comment-page-1/#comment-969899</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=31611#comment-969899</guid>
		<description>How can you think gaming without controls is doomed to failure?  I mean what is a video game but simulated reality?  Whether you&#039;re pretending to be a spy, soldier, mage, or battle field commander...  It&#039;s simulating the experience of that particular reality.

It serves to reason that if pretending to be a mage is fun, not having to pretend very much at all would be even more fun.  Isn&#039;t that the reason most people prefer Call of Duty to the first Duke Nukem?  It&#039;s a more realistic simulation.

If you want to hold a control just grab yourself a baseball bat and pretend it&#039;s a longsword.  This is only a few steps away, well okay maybe a few hundred depending upon how large you view the steps, from a real life holodeck.  What&#039;s not to be excited about?  If you honestly think joysticks are superior, I&#039;m afraid I have to lump you in with those die hard gamers who only play text rpg&#039;s like zork or net hack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you think gaming without controls is doomed to failure?  I mean what is a video game but simulated reality?  Whether you&#8217;re pretending to be a spy, soldier, mage, or battle field commander&#8230;  It&#8217;s simulating the experience of that particular reality.</p>
<p>It serves to reason that if pretending to be a mage is fun, not having to pretend very much at all would be even more fun.  Isn&#8217;t that the reason most people prefer Call of Duty to the first Duke Nukem?  It&#8217;s a more realistic simulation.</p>
<p>If you want to hold a control just grab yourself a baseball bat and pretend it&#8217;s a longsword.  This is only a few steps away, well okay maybe a few hundred depending upon how large you view the steps, from a real life holodeck.  What&#8217;s not to be excited about?  If you honestly think joysticks are superior, I&#8217;m afraid I have to lump you in with those die hard gamers who only play text rpg&#8217;s like zork or net hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

