<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No New &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; Books For Summer 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/16/no-new-star-trek-books-for-summer-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/16/no-new-star-trek-books-for-summer-2010/</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankjad</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/16/no-new-star-trek-books-for-summer-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1437941</link>
		<dc:creator>frankjad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=38313#comment-1437941</guid>
		<description>Great...by focusing on books based on the &#039;revamp&#039; of classic Trek (which is a put-down to REAL trekkers/trekkies), series like Vanguard, IKS Gorken, Enterprise, and the relaunched ST:TNG, ST:DS9 are left in the dark. Disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great&#8230;by focusing on books based on the &#8216;revamp&#8217; of classic Trek (which is a put-down to REAL trekkers/trekkies), series like Vanguard, IKS Gorken, Enterprise, and the relaunched ST:TNG, ST:DS9 are left in the dark. Disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Black</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/16/no-new-star-trek-books-for-summer-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1342182</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=38313#comment-1342182</guid>
		<description>I am not a big fan of “Star Trek” but I did watch the remake film they did and I have to say it was better than expected and if they do get round to making more and releasing it on DVD ill probably give it a watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a big fan of “Star Trek” but I did watch the remake film they did and I have to say it was better than expected and if they do get round to making more and releasing it on DVD ill probably give it a watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/16/no-new-star-trek-books-for-summer-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1334503</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=38313#comment-1334503</guid>
		<description>Good. I knew it was way too soon to develop literary sequels to a movie that will almost undoubtedly go in a whole different direction when its released and thus create massive inconsistencies with these novels right out of the gate. From a literary standpoint, in fact, I&#039;d much rather see the &quot;J.J.-verse&quot; disregarded entirely. The movie was great fun, sure, but I&#039;m a lot less interested in following TWO original Trek timelines at once than other people might think they are. J.J. has re-envisioned Trek for modern cinematic audiences, and that&#039;s fine because he&#039;s remained true to the mythology of the original series, but in the end the only big difference will be the destruction of Vulcan. I&#039;m fine with a few more movies being made from this premise, but I don&#039;t want two entire series of original Trek novels, one taking place in the original timeline and one in the altered timeline. That just seems tedious and pointless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. I knew it was way too soon to develop literary sequels to a movie that will almost undoubtedly go in a whole different direction when its released and thus create massive inconsistencies with these novels right out of the gate. From a literary standpoint, in fact, I&#8217;d much rather see the &#8220;J.J.-verse&#8221; disregarded entirely. The movie was great fun, sure, but I&#8217;m a lot less interested in following TWO original Trek timelines at once than other people might think they are. J.J. has re-envisioned Trek for modern cinematic audiences, and that&#8217;s fine because he&#8217;s remained true to the mythology of the original series, but in the end the only big difference will be the destruction of Vulcan. I&#8217;m fine with a few more movies being made from this premise, but I don&#8217;t want two entire series of original Trek novels, one taking place in the original timeline and one in the altered timeline. That just seems tedious and pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slipstream</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/16/no-new-star-trek-books-for-summer-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1111944</link>
		<dc:creator>Slipstream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 06:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=38313#comment-1111944</guid>
		<description>Hmm, usually I&#039;d ignore these as I&#039;m not a super-trek fan, but since it was a revamp, it might be fun to check these out whenever they release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, usually I&#8217;d ignore these as I&#8217;m not a super-trek fan, but since it was a revamp, it might be fun to check these out whenever they release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

