Comments on: Doom Discussion: 67th Annual Golden Globe Winners & Losers http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/17/doom-discussion-67th-annual-golden-globes-winners-losers/ Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:38:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Dr. Geek, Ph.D. http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/17/doom-discussion-67th-annual-golden-globes-winners-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-1115934 Dr. Geek, Ph.D. Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:10:00 +0000 http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=38407#comment-1115934 Why so hard on Sandra Bullock? I thought that The Blind Side was her best work in years... namely, you could tell she was actually playing a character in a movie, and not that romantic comedy screen persona she's worked out for herself. Then again, perhaps that is not miraculous, and can merely be thought of as "acting, thank you." Why so hard on Sandra Bullock? I thought that The Blind Side was her best work in years… namely, you could tell she was actually playing a character in a movie, and not that romantic comedy screen persona she’s worked out for herself.

Then again, perhaps that is not miraculous, and can merely be thought of as “acting, thank you.”

]]> By: Niko http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/17/doom-discussion-67th-annual-golden-globes-winners-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-1113127 Niko Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:26:56 +0000 http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=38407#comment-1113127 I think I missed the part where Sherlock Holmes was a musical or a comedy. I think I missed the part where Sherlock Holmes was a musical or a comedy.

]]>