<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New &#8216;Dune&#8217; Director Pierre Morel Wasn&#8217;t Satisfied With David Lynch&#8217;s Movie; Has Big Plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/17/new-dune-director-pierre-morel-wasnt-satisfied-with-david-lynchs-movie-has-big-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/17/new-dune-director-pierre-morel-wasnt-satisfied-with-david-lynchs-movie-has-big-plans/</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harkonen</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/17/new-dune-director-pierre-morel-wasnt-satisfied-with-david-lynchs-movie-has-big-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-1113613</link>
		<dc:creator>Harkonen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=38330#comment-1113613</guid>
		<description>Garbo thanks for not slamming Lynch&#039;s version. Sooo many people I speak to immediately tear his vision apart. His film resonates and has stayed with me since I saw it so many years ago. Admittedly there are problems and things that I hope will be improved upon. I would hope that everyone would admit the acting was fantastic, esp the Baron was a big standout for me. Others think the SciFi channels version was superior, I don&#039;t agree. Looking hopeful about this new attempt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garbo thanks for not slamming Lynch&#8217;s version. Sooo many people I speak to immediately tear his vision apart. His film resonates and has stayed with me since I saw it so many years ago. Admittedly there are problems and things that I hope will be improved upon. I would hope that everyone would admit the acting was fantastic, esp the Baron was a big standout for me. Others think the SciFi channels version was superior, I don&#8217;t agree. Looking hopeful about this new attempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garbo</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/01/17/new-dune-director-pierre-morel-wasnt-satisfied-with-david-lynchs-movie-has-big-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-1112886</link>
		<dc:creator>Garbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=38330#comment-1112886</guid>
		<description>I always thought that David Lynch&#039;s vision for Dune was spectacular, but that the structure of the film was all wrong. I loved the use of graphics and narration in the film&#039;s first quarter. That was a very original technique at the time, and is still quite interesting. 

The problem was that Lynch&#039;s Dune is that it felt like 80% exposition, and then it rushed to conclusion. Everything up to and including the Harkonian attack on Arrakis was great, but then it falls apart. Paul&#039;s emergence as Mau&#039;dib, the birth of his supremely powerful sister, and the rise of the Arrakis jihad occurred so quickly that it was rendered totally devoid of drama.

I tried to watch the extended (Alan Smithee) cut once, but the edit was disastrously unpolished and painful to watch. 

This new director sounds questionable. &#039;Dune&#039; is really situated in fantasy and allegory, not sci-fi. Being too particular about technology could compromise it&#039;s unique qualities. There are reasons why the story is set on a desert world, where people battle for a rare resource, where the rebels call for a &#039;messiah&#039; to lead their &#039;jihad&#039;, and why the planet&#039;s name is pronounced: Iraqis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that David Lynch&#8217;s vision for Dune was spectacular, but that the structure of the film was all wrong. I loved the use of graphics and narration in the film&#8217;s first quarter. That was a very original technique at the time, and is still quite interesting. </p>
<p>The problem was that Lynch&#8217;s Dune is that it felt like 80% exposition, and then it rushed to conclusion. Everything up to and including the Harkonian attack on Arrakis was great, but then it falls apart. Paul&#8217;s emergence as Mau&#8217;dib, the birth of his supremely powerful sister, and the rise of the Arrakis jihad occurred so quickly that it was rendered totally devoid of drama.</p>
<p>I tried to watch the extended (Alan Smithee) cut once, but the edit was disastrously unpolished and painful to watch. </p>
<p>This new director sounds questionable. &#8216;Dune&#8217; is really situated in fantasy and allegory, not sci-fi. Being too particular about technology could compromise it&#8217;s unique qualities. There are reasons why the story is set on a desert world, where people battle for a rare resource, where the rebels call for a &#8216;messiah&#8217; to lead their &#8216;jihad&#8217;, and why the planet&#8217;s name is pronounced: Iraqis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

