<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geek Discussion: 82nd Annual Academy Award Winners &amp; Losers!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/03/08/geek-discussion-82nd-annual-academy-award-winners-losers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/03/08/geek-discussion-82nd-annual-academy-award-winners-losers/</link>
	<description>Stuff by geeks, about geeks, for geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chynna</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/03/08/geek-discussion-82nd-annual-academy-award-winners-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-1214128</link>
		<dc:creator>Chynna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=44790#comment-1214128</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree in your thinking that Tarantino was snubbed. He and Basterds was very deserving of more than just a best supporting actor oscar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree in your thinking that Tarantino was snubbed. He and Basterds was very deserving of more than just a best supporting actor oscar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MelodyJ</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/03/08/geek-discussion-82nd-annual-academy-award-winners-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-1213335</link>
		<dc:creator>MelodyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=44790#comment-1213335</guid>
		<description>i agree with most of thepost.  I don&#039;t really get into reward shows.  The trailers for Avatar didn&#039;t even look that good.  i&#039;m glad for most of the winners</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with most of thepost.  I don&#8217;t really get into reward shows.  The trailers for Avatar didn&#8217;t even look that good.  i&#8217;m glad for most of the winners</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TM</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/03/08/geek-discussion-82nd-annual-academy-award-winners-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-1212909</link>
		<dc:creator>TM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=44790#comment-1212909</guid>
		<description>I, for one, am disappointed that Avatar didn&#039;t win.  So it&#039;s a decent, but not great, story.  So it&#039;s got some uneven performances.  I believe the same can be said of the other nominees, frankly.  But it&#039;s been a long time since I was astounded by what I saw.  Avatar (in 3D) did that.  It raised the bar for what is possible with filmmaking.  No other movie did that this year.  

I loved Inglorious Basterds, and understand why people should argue it should have won.  It was a great film--certainly much better than Hurt Locker, which was one of the more forgettable of the films nominated.  But, the Best Picture of the year was Avatar, warts and all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, am disappointed that Avatar didn&#8217;t win.  So it&#8217;s a decent, but not great, story.  So it&#8217;s got some uneven performances.  I believe the same can be said of the other nominees, frankly.  But it&#8217;s been a long time since I was astounded by what I saw.  Avatar (in 3D) did that.  It raised the bar for what is possible with filmmaking.  No other movie did that this year.  </p>
<p>I loved Inglorious Basterds, and understand why people should argue it should have won.  It was a great film&#8211;certainly much better than Hurt Locker, which was one of the more forgettable of the films nominated.  But, the Best Picture of the year was Avatar, warts and all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scrotumbagmonkeyflicker</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/03/08/geek-discussion-82nd-annual-academy-award-winners-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-1212679</link>
		<dc:creator>scrotumbagmonkeyflicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=44790#comment-1212679</guid>
		<description>Maybe I need to watch hurt locker again because I didnt think it was that good. I mean its good but not oscar worthy but congrats to Kathryn Bigelow Oscar gigolo... Wait a minute I forgot.... SCREW THE OSCARS!!

I&#039;m just glad Avatar didnt clean up at the awards, only fit to clean the toilets IMO, but it should have got a hype award and a style over substance award... I&#039;m such a hater  :)

Glad Trek got an award though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I need to watch hurt locker again because I didnt think it was that good. I mean its good but not oscar worthy but congrats to Kathryn Bigelow Oscar gigolo&#8230; Wait a minute I forgot&#8230;. SCREW THE OSCARS!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just glad Avatar didnt clean up at the awards, only fit to clean the toilets IMO, but it should have got a hype award and a style over substance award&#8230; I&#8217;m such a hater  :)</p>
<p>Glad Trek got an award though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/03/08/geek-discussion-82nd-annual-academy-award-winners-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-1212263</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=44790#comment-1212263</guid>
		<description>Eve,
I agree with all of that.
I really do.
I have a confession to make, I can&#039;t really get that worked up over the Oscars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eve,<br />
I agree with all of that.<br />
I really do.<br />
I have a confession to make, I can&#8217;t really get that worked up over the Oscars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bourgeois Brat</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/03/08/geek-discussion-82nd-annual-academy-award-winners-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-1212253</link>
		<dc:creator>Bourgeois Brat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=44790#comment-1212253</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure James Cameron knew Avatar wasn&#039;t going to win, going in. Just like Spielberg knew his films weren&#039;t going to win.

Mo&#039;Nique (Yippee)
Jeff Bridges (Righteous)
Christoph Waltz (Brillant)
Sandra Bullock (Felt like a &quot;mercy choice&quot;)

I appreciated Hurt Locker when I saw it, but I didn&#039;t leave the theater feelin&#039; like I&#039;d want to see it again. I was wishing I had a remote, after the first 15 minutes of Avatar :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure James Cameron knew Avatar wasn&#8217;t going to win, going in. Just like Spielberg knew his films weren&#8217;t going to win.</p>
<p>Mo&#8217;Nique (Yippee)<br />
Jeff Bridges (Righteous)<br />
Christoph Waltz (Brillant)<br />
Sandra Bullock (Felt like a &#8220;mercy choice&#8221;)</p>
<p>I appreciated Hurt Locker when I saw it, but I didn&#8217;t leave the theater feelin&#8217; like I&#8217;d want to see it again. I was wishing I had a remote, after the first 15 minutes of Avatar :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Empress Eve</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2010/03/08/geek-discussion-82nd-annual-academy-award-winners-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-1212233</link>
		<dc:creator>Empress Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksofdoom.com/?p=44790#comment-1212233</guid>
		<description>Happy about Jeff Bridges, Christoph Waltz, and Mo’Nique. 

I know Sandra Bullock was the popular vote AND the upset, but I didn&#039;t see the film so can&#039;t judge, but I don&#039;t think she&#039;s a *bad* actress. Good for her for taking on a dramatic role and wanting more for herself than just rom-coms.

While I really enjoyed Avatar, I think it deserved technical awards, but little else. No actors from the film were nominated, so what does that tell you about the performances? I think we can all agree that they weren&#039;t all that great; and at times, the dialogue was painful and story nonsensical. I don&#039;t think it should have won just because it&#039;s a big-budget blockbuster. Inglorious Basterds is best picture material -- it will hold up over time.

Oh, and Star Trek won Best Make-up, woo hoo!!! [Deserved more, I think, but happy that it got at least 1 Oscar].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy about Jeff Bridges, Christoph Waltz, and Mo’Nique. </p>
<p>I know Sandra Bullock was the popular vote AND the upset, but I didn&#8217;t see the film so can&#8217;t judge, but I don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s a *bad* actress. Good for her for taking on a dramatic role and wanting more for herself than just rom-coms.</p>
<p>While I really enjoyed Avatar, I think it deserved technical awards, but little else. No actors from the film were nominated, so what does that tell you about the performances? I think we can all agree that they weren&#8217;t all that great; and at times, the dialogue was painful and story nonsensical. I don&#8217;t think it should have won just because it&#8217;s a big-budget blockbuster. Inglorious Basterds is best picture material &#8212; it will hold up over time.</p>
<p>Oh, and Star Trek won Best Make-up, woo hoo!!! [Deserved more, I think, but happy that it got at least 1 Oscar].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

