head
head head head
Home Contact RSS Feed
News   •   Features   •   Reviews   •   Podcasts   •   Contests   •   Contact Us   •   About Us
Movie Review: Titanic (3D)
Mr. BabyMan   |  

Titanic
3D presentation
Directed by James Cameron
Starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Kate Winslet, Billy Zane
Rated PG-13
Release Date (3D Version): April 4, 2012

I’ve now officially contributed twice to the highest grossing motion picture in history.

I had the opportunity to go out to the movies the other night, and I had a lot of choices, including a remake of 21 Jump Street I’d heard was quite funny, and a reunion sequel to American Pie, but my decision in the end was determined by a film whose experience I couldn’t replicate at home: James Cameron’s 3D post-conversion of Titanic (1997).

The last time I saw Titanic was in the theaters fifteen years ago. It’s not that I hadn’t enjoyed it; I had always meant to see it again. I’d even picked up a DVD at one point (okay, so I contributed thrice), but I’d never unwrapped it. My recollection of it was that it was technically brilliant, but flawed in many ways. I just never felt that compelled to revisit it. Cameron’s year-long, $18 million 3D conversion gave me a good excuse to do just that.

For the few people in the world who haven’t seen it, Titanic is a retelling of the 1912 tragic sinking of the eponymous British passenger liner, ironically dubbed “unsinkable” by its builders. The White Star liner hit an iceberg in the North Atlantic on April 15, 1912, which set off a series of events that would find the ship at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean less than three hours later, with 1,514 of her 2,224 passengers drowned or frozen to death. Cameron’s version is framed by a fictional recollection of one of its survivors, Rose DeWitt Bukater (played by Kate Winslet in flashback and Gloria Stuart in present-day), a society girl fated to marry wealthy industrialist Cal Hockley (Billy Zane), when her destiny is sidetracked by devil-may-care vagabond Jack Dawson (Leonardo DiCaprio). Their romance blossoms, an iceberg strikes Titanic’s hull, and the rest is, literally, history.

Seeing it again fifteen years later (and having seen many, many films since) has softened my perspective on it a bit. It wasn’t nearly as bad as I remembered. Technically it still holds up quite well, and is an astonishment to watch in its slavish dedication to historical verisimilitude in all aspects outside the Rose/Jack storyline. It’s easy to see the reported $200 million dollar budget on-screen in the ship sets’ frighteningly accurate detail.

The film isn’t perfect, however, and this time around I was able to summarize Titanic’s major problems into a few points:

  • Any scene involving Jack and Rose’s relationship is horribly stilted and on-the-nose. This is my major complaint with Titanic, and what makes the difference between (merely) an impressive cinematic accomplishment and what could have been an unqualified romantic film classic on the level of Casablanca or Gone With the Wind. While Winslet and DiCaprio’s on-screen chemistry is palpable, they’re constantly sabotaged by Cameron’s soulless dialogue.
  • Titanic is simplistically heavy handed in its portrayal of class differences. While class was an issue aboard Titanic, here it’s shoved down our throats. Most first-class passengers (besides Kathy Batesnouveau riche “Unsinkable” Molly Brown) are cold, heartless narcissists, and most steerage passengers are rustic, illiterate, yet blissfully happy in their squalor. There are no shades of gray in between in Cameron’s world. I can only assume he paints in these broad strokes due to the sheer amount of storytelling needed for such a compressed running time.
  • Gloria Stuart was an astonishingly poor casting choice as old Rose. She delivers Cameron’s forced lines as if she’s narrating an audiobook on the subject of Titanic, not reliving the most intense and memorable life-changing event of her life. Despite the clever passage-of-time transitions, there’s no connection between Winslet’s curiously spirited Rose, and Stuart’s monotone performance. If the audience can’t buy her as the elder version of Kate Winslet, there’s no point in having her in the picture, and by effect, the whole deep-sea salvage framing device and the “Heart of the Sea” either.
  • Titanic’s god-awful parting final shot, which I will not spoil, but to say it involves a ham-fistedly sentimental absolution of its major characters. It was like finishing a fine four-course meal with an after-dinner mint made of crap.

The 3D effects were restrained and never showy. The 3D post-conversion was impeccable, as if the footage was originally acquired in 3D, and should stand as an example for any studio considering post-conversion. In fact, it only stood to highlight some of the technical limitations of 1997′s state-of-the-art special effects, which Cameron chose (for whatever reason) not to update for 2012. One particularly egregious example is a scene where Jack and Rose are running away, in slow-motion, from a wave of water in one of Titanic’s flooded corridors. It’s painfully obvious to see Winslet and DiCaprio’s faces digitally pasted onto the stunt actors’ bodies.

If you can suspend disbelief of the main relationship, watching Titanic feels as close to having been on board during that fateful night without all the hypothermic chill of the North Atlantic. Overall, it was absolutely worth a revisit, and definitely worth seeing on the big screen, if you’ve never seen it before.

Previous Article
Next Article
«
»
Around the Web
Geeks of Doom on Instagram Follow Geeks of Doom on Tumblr
Geeks of Doom on YouTube Geeks of Doom on Pinterest
Geeks of Doom Email Digest Geeks of Doom RSS Feed
Google
Amazon.com
Check out all of our current contests listings
Check out all of our current contests listings
space
space
The Drill Down Podcast TARDISblend Podcast Skull-Face Island Movie Podcast
BlendoveR
Get Geeks of Doom Gear on CafePress
BlendoveR   ·   Cinema Blend   ·   Collider   ·   Film School Rejects   ·   First Showing   ·   io9   ·   Latino Review   ·   Screen Rant   ·   Slashfilm   ·   The Mary Sue
2520 Clothing Company
Animated  ·  Apps  ·  Art  ·  Best-Sellers  ·  Bits of Doom  ·  Blog  ·  Blu-ray  ·  Book of Geek  ·  Books  ·  Cartoons  ·  Celebrity  ·  Charity  ·  Collectibles  ·  Comics  ·  Computers  ·  Contests  ·  Conventions  ·  Deals  ·  DIY  ·  Documentary  ·  Doom Deliveries  ·  DVDs  ·  Electronics  ·  Environment  ·  Fanatic  ·  Features  ·  Gadgets  ·  Games  ·  Gear  ·  Geek Finds  ·  Geek Girls  ·  Gift Guide  ·  Holidays  ·  Humor  ·  Interviews  ·  Movies  ·  Music  ·  News  ·  News Bytes  ·  Obit  ·  Photos  ·  Podcasts  ·  Politics  ·  Poll  ·  Press Releases  ·  Recaps  ·  Reviews  ·  Rumors  ·  Science  ·  Software  ·  Sports  ·  Technology  ·  Television  ·  Theater  ·  Theme Parks  ·  Trailers  ·  Travel  ·  Video Games  ·  Videos  ·  Web Games  ·  Week of Geek  ·  Zombie Round-Up
space
January 2014  ·   December 2013  ·   November 2013  ·   October 2013  ·   September 2013  ·   August 2013  ·   July 2013  ·   June 2013  ·   May 2013  ·   April 2013  ·   March 2013  ·   February 2013  ·   January 2013  ·   December 2012  ·   November 2012  ·   October 2012  ·   September 2012  ·   August 2012  ·   July 2012  ·   June 2012  ·   May 2012  ·   April 2012  ·   March 2012  ·   February 2012  ·   January 2012  ·   December 2011  ·   November 2011  ·   October 2011  ·   September 2011  ·   August 2011  ·   July 2011  ·   June 2011  ·   May 2011  ·   April 2011  ·   March 2011  ·   February 2011  ·   January 2011  ·   December 2010  ·   November 2010  ·   Octber 2010  ·   September 2010  ·   August 2010  ·   July 2010  ·   June 2010  ·   May 2010  ·   April 2010  ·   March 2010  ·   February 2010  ·   January 2010  ·   December 2009  ·   November 2009  ·   Octber 2009  ·   September 2009  ·   August 2009  ·   July 2009  ·   June 2009  ·   May 2009  ·   April 2009  ·   March 2009  ·   February 2009  ·   January 2009  ·   December 2008  ·   November 2008  ·   Octber 2008  ·   September 2008  ·   August 2008  ·   July 2008  ·   June 2008  ·   May 2008  ·   April 2008  ·   March 2008  ·   February 2008  ·   January 2008  ·   December 2007  ·   November 2007  ·   Octber 2007  ·   September 2007  ·   August 2007  ·   July 2007  ·   June 2007  ·   May 2007  ·   April 2007  ·   March 2007  ·   February 2007  ·   January 2007  ·   December 2006  ·   November 2006  ·   Octber 2006  ·   September 2006  ·   August 2006  ·   July 2006  ·   June 2006  ·   May 2006  ·   April 2006  ·   March 2006
space
Creative Commons License
This website is licensed under
a Creative Commons License.
space
Geeks of Doom is proudly powered by WordPress.

Students of the Unusual™ comic cover used with permission of 3BoysProductions
The Mercuri Bros.™ comic cover used with permission of Prodigal Son Press

Geeks of Doom is designed and maintained by our geeky webmaster
All original content copyright ©2005-2014 Geeks of Doom
All external content copyright of its respective owner, except where noted

Privacy Policy | Contact
space
space